From BBC
News, a man has been given a 350-day suspended sentence for
poisoning his ex-wife with mercury. The sentence is rather light for
the crime (even if he did plead guilty, was of previous good
character, etc.)
The judge's decision wasn't what most got to me about the
story. It actually gets worse...
Paul Lewis, for the defendant, said in mitigation that Dowling had
"only intended to annoy his wife so she would feel the need for him to
care for her and so resurrect their relationship".
Mr Lewis suggested that because Mrs Dowling was still able to work
as a cleaner, she had overplayed her symptoms.
So, the defence is basically saying: "in mitigation, my client is
dangerously manipulative and completely lacking in empathy, and he was
stopped before the poisoning reached fatal levels.". That's
mitigation? That's the argument intended to reduce
sentencing?
And from the judge, while sentencing:
"What is relevant is that you are not a medical expert and it follows from that that it was more by good luck than anything else that your wife did not suffer serious harm," said [Judge Robert Brown]
So... it's okay to poison your ex-wife as long as you read up on
the options for poison in advance and ensure you pick one that will
not have too many long-term side effects despite repeated
application.
I wish this refusal to take domestic violence seriously was atypical.